ELECTRONIC MONITORING ALERT DEVICE

Brand Owner (click to sort) Address Description
HOLDBACK GROSSMAN, RICHARD 2011 Cummings Drive Los Angeles CA 90027 Electronic monitoring and alert device, namely, a device that monitors the on-hold status of telephone callers and generates an alert signaling that the on-hold status is being terminated;HOLD BACK;
HOLDBACK GROSSMAN, RICHARD 2011 Cummings Drive Los Angeles CA 90027 Electronic monitoring and alert device, namely, a device that monitors the on-hold status of telephone callers and generates an alert signaling that the on-hold status is being terminated;HOLD BACK;
HOLDBUSTER GROSSMAN, RICHARD 2011 Cummings Drive Los Angeles CA 90027 Electronic monitoring and alert device, namely, a device that monitors the on-hold status of telephone callers and generates an alert signaling that the on-hold status is being terminated;HOLD BUSTER;
HOLDBUSTER GROSSMAN, RICHARD 2011 Cummings Drive Los Angeles CA 90027 Electronic monitoring and alert device, namely, a device that monitors the on-hold status of telephone callers and generates an alert signaling that the on-hold status is being terminated;HOLD BUSTER;
 

Where the owner name is not linked, that owner no longer owns the brand

    
Technical Examples
  1. A communication apparatus includes a communication device (130) and an activity monitoring device (120). The communication device (130) includes an alert device (275) for notifying a user (110) of an incoming call. The communication device (130) further includes a controller (210) for selecting a mode of the alert device (275). The controller (210) judges, based on data from the activity monitoring device (120), whether the user can be disturbed, and, if the user (110) can be disturbed, the controller (210) selects an audible mode of the alert device (275). If the controller (210) determines that the user (110) cannot be disturbed, then the controller (210) selects a silent mode of the alert device (275). The activity monitoring device (120) produces data representing a biometric characteristic of the user (110), which is used by the controller (210) to judge whether the user (110) can be disturbed. A corresponding method (FIG. 6 and FIG. 7) selects an appropriate alert mode based user biometrics.